Talk:Glenn Research Center

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Lar in topic Plum Brook status unclear

Center Logos Not Official

edit

Since early 2000, NASA Centers have not had any official logo to represent them other than the use of the NASA meatball per several memos from NASA HQ. (see http://www.nasawatch.com/worm/05.31.00.ulrich.html for one example). Since the logos are no official and not in use on anything publically sent out from NASA, why are they in use on Wikipedia? jtowns 04:48, 21 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Visitor Center Closed

edit

The visitor center at the NASA Glenn facility will be closing in September 2009. They are trying to move some of the displays to the Great Lakes Science Center, in downtown Cleveland, however that is uncertain at this time. I will be making mention of this on the main page. Boufa (talk) 22:45, 26 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

"(see #History for previous names)"

edit

In the header: NASA John H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field (see #History for previous names) is a NASA center

Is the "(see #History for previous names)" necessary? It ruins the flow of the opening section and doesn't seem like it needs to be there. I'll remove it the next time I remember.

Minkus (talk) 14:21, 26 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Glenn Research Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:03, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Glenn Research Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:01, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Glenn Research Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:44, 18 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Glenn Research Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:33, 8 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Plum Brook status unclear

edit

Article seems unclear about Plum Brook. It lists off some facilities located there but says some are partially open. What is the state of the facilities there as of 2018? ++Lar: t/c 13:07, 18 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

[1] suggests that at least the Space Environments Complex and In-Space Propulsion Facility are operational, as of August 2018. TJRC (talk) 23:37, 18 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
And Science in Flux: NASA's Nuclear Program at Plum Brook Station 1955-2005 details the history of the Plum Brook Reactor; the decommisioning and demolition is detailed in Chapter 7, "Restoring the Garden"" TJRC (talk) 23:50, 18 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Going through the list:
  • B-2 Spacecraft Propulsion Research Facility: see comment about "In-Space Propulsion Facility" above;
  • Combined Effects Chamber: Seems to be operational; see [2];
  • Cryogenic Components Laboratory: [3] lists a contact for it as of March 28, 2018; that kind of suggests it's still around, but does not directly contradict the "slated for demolition" currently in the article;
  • Hypersonic Test Facility: this article suggests it was still operational as of January 2018.
  • Space Power Facility: See [4]; apparently still operational as of July 2018;
  • Plum Brook Reactor: see comment above; also the book NASA’s Nuclear Frontier: The Plum Brook Reactor Facility, 1941—2002 may be of interest.
TJRC (talk) 00:06, 19 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! Is that worth editing into the article? Seems sound to me. ++Lar: t/c 19:26, 23 December 2018 (UTC)Reply