Talk:Gliclazide

Generational status

Most articles I've read show it as being a second generation sulfonylurea. However, there is the one reference that shows it as a first generation. Can anybody offer any clarity on the generation of gliclazide? Perhaps there was a change in generation, or it has properties of both generations?- ellusion - (talk) 12:57, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Second gen, see source given in 3 April 2017 Talk entry. Leprof 7272 (talk) 07:50, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Other names

Sold as Diamicron and Glyade in Australia (and elsewhere?) 122.107.58.27 (talk) 23:47, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Why no mention re: the sulfonylurea CV safety issue

…generally or specifically, especially as this is an apparent positive distinctive attribute of this particular second gen compound. For a starting point, see here. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 07:50, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Globalize / undue emphasis?

Should the sentence saying a medication is not sold in the United States be there? Firstly, that is a null report. Shouldn't an article say where it is sold, rather than where it isn't? Secondly, I suspect it isn't sold in some other countries, but only the United States is mentioned. If the drug has been explicitly banned by American regulators, that would be a reasonable comment. Humphrey Tribble (talk) 21:14, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: PHMD 2040 Service - Learning Spring 2023

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 January 2023 and 30 June 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): JustinxLane (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by JustinxLane (talk) 19:04, 2 June 2023 (UTC)