Talk:Gliricidia sepium
 | A fact from Gliricidia sepium appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 October 2008, and was viewed approximately 1,514 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 10 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Lmotas.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:26, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Logan Motas's Review
editWhat does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way? I really liked that you included that they're angiosperms as well as all of the different names it goes by. I can tell that someone with a background in plants put together this article because there's information on intercropping, which I think is super cool. That really impressed me, and made me want to add that to my own article. What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement? What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? The only thing I would suggest you change or add on would be changing the "(unranked)" portion of the right hand side of the page, just because that's where my eyes go first and the "(unranked)" is inconspicuous, and I'm not too sure what you mean by that.
"Names in other languages" section redundant in purpose with "Common names"
editInformation in "Names in other languages" should be merged with "Common names" 2001:FD8:F400:3BE9:EC25:F65F:72E2:C86C (talk) 22:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)