Talk:Global Justice Now

Untitled

The first paragraph reads like an excerpt from the organization's own promotional materials. In particular, phrasing like "However, fundamental change is not achieved easily - running as it does contrary to the perceived national interests of the developed world" doesn't sound very NPOV to me. Is this really OK? Kai MacTane 17:34, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

"As these interests currently harm the lives of so many poor people," This doesn't seem NPOV at all... it is arguable how world development affects different parts of the world. It sounds like some sort of promotion.

--Atorpey 19:19, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Global Justice Now. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070812180029/http://www.ourworldisnotforsale.org:80/signees_ns.asp?offset=-1 to http://www.ourworldisnotforsale.org/signees_ns.asp?offset=-1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:30, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Controversial controversy section

The Controversy section seems to constitute the actual controversy: I couldn't find any reference to third parties discussing this "controversy". In addition the response by Global Justice Now in the second paragraph appears to constitute their actual response! as no similar notice can be found on their website for example. (The user who made this change in fact describes it as the organisation's "response" in their Edit summary.) The entire section seems to be a kind of "original research": a manufactured controversy (though the facts may be true) and an unsourced response to said controversy. I've added a few Citation needed tags for now but suggest this entire section could be reduced to a few lines or, failing any third party references, the entire section could be deleted. Bob.Churchill (talk) 12:11, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Global Justice Now. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120205032118/http://www.wdm.org.uk/climate-debt-campaign/what-wdm-doing to http://www.wdm.org.uk/climate-debt-campaign/what-wdm-doing
• Added archive https://archive.is/20150129122219/http://www.persuadedmagazine.com/2014/12/26/wdm-changes-its-name/ to http://www.persuadedmagazine.com/2014/12/26/wdm-changes-its-name/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:40, 3 December 2017 (UTC)