Talk:Global Partnership for Education

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Template index/Speedy deletion

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Template index/Speedy deletion, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please visit the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Aichemoussa (talk) 22:03, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

This page has little relevance considering all the flags raised about its content. Would it be possible to have it deleted? (as was announced in the latest warning)

WP:AFD is the location for requesting deletion. Theroadislong (talk) 17:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

New temporary page

Hi,

I created a new temporary page with new information in my sandbox and published it as suggested by Wikipedia's team. We want it to replace this page which has an outdated content. Would you please help me process it? Thank you. Aichemoussa (talk) 11:16, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

No, that is NOT how it works you are welcome to suggest changes here in the form of change x to y with a reliable source, but we don't replace whole articles with your preferred content. You can request edits with the template {{edit COI}}. Theroadislong (talk) 11:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply. I just followed a suggestion made in my talk. Now I am confused. Aichemoussa (talk) 11:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Your new draft Global Partnership for Education/Temp is entirely inappropriate, content like “A remarkable collaboration”, “. GPE has now emerged as a response to the pressing need for coordinated efforts to address educational challenges in developing countries”, “GPE has evolved into a key player in the global education landscape, working tirelessly to ensure that every child receives a quality education.”, “has been led by dedicated individuals” is all just blatant marketing trumpery. Theroadislong (talk) 12:03, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Entirely inappropriate? I though Wikipedia was a collaborative platform. If a content is "inappropriate" as you said, contributors are free to edit it. I don't understand why you guys don't want to delete the first page and even help in finding a solution. There is no collaboration here, just another form of control, which I believe in unfortunate! Aichemoussa (talk) 12:11, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not here for you to use as a promotional tool, we base articles on what reliable independent sources report, we have little interest in what you want to say about your own organisation. Theroadislong (talk) 12:14, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

There is no promotion here but only facts that can be verified online. I provided other references that are credible. But clearly you are just blocking it for unknown reasons. Please satisfy your ego if that makes you feel good. We accept whatever decision Wikipedia will apply. Moving forward now. Aichemoussa (talk) 12:36, 9 April 2024 (UTC)