Talk:Global Slavery Index

Numbers on the list are getting sorted wrong

So it seems that in the list (mainly in the estimated population in slavery field) someone used . instead of , which I know is valid in some places but the list gets sorted wrong as a result. Can some setting be changed to fix that or is it necessary to change them all to commas? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.52.198.8 (talk) 08:11, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your report, the problem is fixed now.Faltur (talk) 18:28, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Is anyone interested in the 2013 data?

The section Global_Slavery_Index#Global_Slavery_Index_2013 is incomplete and out of date. I propose that we delete it. Matthew C. Clarke 12:40, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Oppose: Historical data can be helpful, even when the methodology has substantially changed. Once 2015 data are available and have been posted, we can review whether 2013 data should be deleted. Meclee (talk) 13:53, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Global Slavery Index. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150423202435/http://d3mj66ag90b5fy.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/GSI2014_full_methodology_new-op.pdf to http://d3mj66ag90b5fy.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/GSI2014_full_methodology_new-op.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150112190748/http://d3mj66ag90b5fy.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/2014GSI_GLOBALDATA.xlsx to http://d3mj66ag90b5fy.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/2014GSI_GLOBALDATA.xlsx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150423202435/http://d3mj66ag90b5fy.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/GSI2014_full_methodology_new-op.pdf to http://d3mj66ag90b5fy.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/GSI2014_full_methodology_new-op.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:22, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Population of USA in Table is wrong (USA and India have all numbers swaped. have not checked others) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8070:D283:7600:9CA3:AC06:DF87:490 (talk) 19:35, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

License/copyright

The license for the Global Slavery Index 2023 Dataset seems to be non-standard (https://www.walkfree.org/global-slavery-index/downloads/). Would crediting as described in license "Global Slavery Index [year] Dataset, Minderoo Foundation, available from: www.globalslaveryindex.org" be sufficient for derivative work/table with values? HudecEmil (talk) 19:03, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Is wokeness involved in critiques of this index?

Is this index criticized in part because it reveals that whites didn't invent slavery, rather, abolished it after making it famous centuries ago? Africa was enslaving its own people long before whites got involved, and delivered slaves to them on the coast. Today, the races perpetuating slavery (aside from sex trafficking) seem to be mostly non-white, which surely triggers denial among wokeists. 24.21.52.169 (talk) 22:21, 21 November 2024 (UTC)