Talk:Globalization in Question
Latest comment: 12 years ago by HairyWombat in topic Removed PROD
 | This page was proposed for deletion by RadioFan (talk · contribs) on 24 January 2010 with the comment: unencyclopedic essay It was contested by Msrasnw (talk · contribs) on 2010-01-24 |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Removed PROD
editRemoved deletion prod. I think the article accurately and neutrally reports the content of the work. The work is one of the most noted works in the globalization literature. How precisely should the article be improved? Which bits are judged to be problematic? (Msrasnw (talk) 20:14, 24 January 2010 (UTC))
- "one of the best and most iconoclastic attempts yet at mapping the new global economy." Will Hutton, The Observer (Msrasnw (talk) 12:30, 29 January 2010 (UTC))
- Agree completely with the removal of the PROD; the article in not an "unencyclopedic essay". However, it could use some more references, particularly detailing its impact. A list of reviews is good, but a discussion of what they say would be even better. HairyWombat 02:44, 18 March 2012 (UTC)