This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago12 comments4 people in discussion
So I saw some activity at this article while watching recent changes and I'm concerned about the sourcing in the Controversies section. Most of the section is sourced to twitter, with one statement sourced to Youtube, and a few to Pitchfork. Most of the Pitchfork content seems ok to me, but both Youtube and Twitter are rated "Generally unreliable" at WP:RSNP. The section on Twitter specifically ends with "Twitter should never be used for third-party claims related to living persons." Given that, I don't see how this sourcing can possibly be acceptable. Some of the wording (especially "Following her rampages online...") also strikes me as non-neutral. I'm removing everything but the Pitchfork content for now. I'm also removing the claim that le Fey harassed Charli XCX as that claim doesn't appear to be supported by the given source (Le Fey is not even mentioned). Pinging @StarryNightSky11, CodeTalker, and 2603:7000:DC40:99:49D9:BB3D:AD60:E3F3:. Thoughts? Am I misunderstanding something? Squeakachu (talk) 23:00, 6 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
Starry, thanks a ton, but I think there's still some copyright issues in the career section where it discusses the controversy in detail. If you have an opportunity to trim that I'd appreciate it. No worries if you can't though, I'll take a closer look in a couple days when I have the time. Thanks again! ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:53, 7 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the input all, and huge thanks to ScottishFinnishRadish for checking the rest of the article and StarryNightSky11 for taking on the cleanup. It's a major improvement. Squeakachu (talk) 02:57, 7 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
Done I've removed the content based upon your findings, any questions or anything else ping me here or message my talk page. Best regards StarryNightSky11(talk)(cont) 00:48, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
