Talk:Glorious First of June order of battle
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Glorious First of June order of battle article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Glorious First of June order of battle is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
 | Glorious First of June order of battle is part of the Atlantic campaign of May 1794 series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Featured list | |||||||||||||
| This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
.svg)
Mont-Blanc or not Mont-Blanc ?
editAfter the matter was raised on my talk page [1], I have a few elements:
- according to my sources (Dictionnaire des bâtiments de la flotte de guerre française de Colbert à nos jours, [2]), no ship of the French Navy was named Mont Blanc on 1 July 1794.
- the ship Mont-Blanc was indeed present, but as Trente-et-un Mai
- a 74-gun Mont-Blanc was reported with Indomptable in tow. The ship which did take Indomptable in tow was the 42-gun frigate Brutus, a razee 74-gun.
That's what I have for now. These elements would suggest to me that someone mistook the Brutus for a 74-gun ship of the line (which she used to be, so in the smoke and excitement...). Furthermore, French ships were renamed everytime political trends changed in Paris, so quite often; I assume that keeping informed of this would be problematic over the Channel. The problem is that this is OR-ish, so I don't know what to do with it. If someone has an idea, do let me know. Cheers ! Rama (talk) 20:32, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
For keeping track of changing names, Alain Demerliac's Nomenclature des navires français 1792-1799 is a great book. --Ken Johnson (talk) 00:23, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Rainiers attached squadron
editSeems to be missing a few names :)
28 May Error
editThe Audacieux did not take part in the fight. It was actually part of Nielly's squadron that hadn't yet linked up with Villaret's fleet. When Nielly stumbled across the disabled Révolutionaire, he sent the Audacieux to take her under tow. Both ships eventually reached Rochefort safely. --Ken Johnson (talk) 00:23, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
29 May Error
editRama is right about the Mont-Blanc being the Trente-et-un Mai, the name should be changed. It did not take the Indomptable in tow. I don't have archival material at hand, so I'm not sure if the Brutus too it in tow, but it was rase ship, so it only had 50 guns and was more like a heavy frigate than a ship of the line.--Ken Johnson (talk) 00:23, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Frigates
editDue to the turbulent situation exisiting in France during 1794, accurate records regarding which frigates were with which fleet and which were present at which action do not exsist. Thus only an incomplete listing of French support craft can be created, based mainly on those recognised and reported by British officers That is BS. The sources exist,British authors are just too lazy to address French sources. I'll come back and fix this up a bit for the French side when I get a chance.--Ken Johnson (talk) 00:23, 19 February 2008 (UTC)