Article (edit | visual edit | history ) · Article talk (edit | history ) · Watch
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs ) 12:04, 22 February 2014 (UTC) Reply
Nominator: SabreBD (talk )
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 12:04, 22 February 2014 (UTC) Reply
Thanks for taking this on.--SabreBD (talk ) 12:43, 22 February 2014 (UTC) Reply
1: Well-written
Done
2: Verifiable with no original research
Done
Check for WP:RS : Done
Cross-checked with other GAs: Scotland in the Late Middle Ages , Scotland in the modern era , Warfare in Medieval Scotland , Scottish society in the Middle Ages , Government in Medieval Scotland , Economy of Scotland in the Middle Ages , Art in Medieval Scotland , Geography of Scotland in the Middle Ages , Scotland in the Middle Ages , Renaissance in Scotland , Romanticism in Scotland , Architecture of Scotland in the Middle Ages , Scottish society in the early modern era , Economy of Scotland in the early modern era , Architecture in early modern Scotland , Architecture in modern Scotland , Architecture of Scotland in the Industrial Revolution , Architecture of Scotland in the Prehistoric era , Architecture of Scotland in the Roman era , Government in early modern Scotland , Church architecture in Scotland , Witch trials in early modern Scotland , Education in early modern Scotland , Art in early modern Scotland , Scotland in the Early Middle Ages , Christianity in Medieval Scotland , Architecture of Scotland
Check for the material (WP:RSVETTING ): (contentious ) Done
Is it contentious?: Yes
Does the ref indeed support the material?:
Check for the author (WP:RSVETTING ): Done
Who is the author?:
Does the author have a Wikipedia article?:
What are the author's academic credentials and professional experience?:
What else has the author published?:
Is the author, or this work, cited in other reliable sources? In academic works?:
Check for the publication (WP:RSVETTING ): Done
Check for Self-published sources (WP:SPS ):
Done
Check for primary sources (WP:PRIMARY ): Done
Check for synthesis (WP:SYN ): Done
Check for original images (WP:OI ): Done
3: Broad in its coverage
Done
Cross-checked with other GAs: Scotland in the Late Middle Ages , Scotland in the modern era , Warfare in Medieval Scotland , Scottish society in the Middle Ages , Government in Medieval Scotland , Economy of Scotland in the Middle Ages , Art in Medieval Scotland , Geography of Scotland in the Middle Ages , Scotland in the Middle Ages , Renaissance in Scotland , Romanticism in Scotland , Architecture of Scotland in the Middle Ages , Scottish society in the early modern era , Economy of Scotland in the early modern era , Architecture in early modern Scotland , Architecture in modern Scotland , Architecture of Scotland in the Industrial Revolution , Architecture of Scotland in the Prehistoric era , Architecture of Scotland in the Roman era , Government in early modern Scotland , Church architecture in Scotland , Witch trials in early modern Scotland , Education in early modern Scotland , Art in early modern Scotland , Scotland in the Early Middle Ages , Christianity in Medieval Scotland , Architecture of Scotland
Check for Article scope as defined by reliable sources :
Check for The extent of the subject matter in these RS :
Check for Out of scope :
Check for The range of material that belongs in the article :
Check for All material that is notable is covered :
Check for All material that is referenced is covered :
Check for All material that a reader would be likely to agree matches the specified scope is covered :
Check for The most general scope that summarises essentially all knowledge :
Check for Stay on topic and no wandering off-topic (WP:OFFTOPIC ):
4: Neutral
5: Stable: No edit wars , etc: Yes
6: Images Done (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license) (PD )
As per the above checklist, there are no issues with the article and it’s a GA. Thanks, SabreBD, very much for your diligence in writing such great articles. I’m inspired a lot by your conscientiousness.
Promoting the article to GA status. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 01:21, 24 February 2014 (UTC) Reply
Many thanks for a prompt review. Much appreciated.--SabreBD (talk ) 07:37, 24 February 2014 (UTC) Reply