Talk:Glossary of communication disorders

Latest comment: 11 months ago by ActivelyDisinterested in topic References and copyright

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 31 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Hannanettles.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:28, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Untitled

edit

The original text of this page is from a public domain resource at http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/glossary/glos1.htm

Maybe this should be moved to wikitionary.

2007-02-1 Automated pywikipediabot message

edit

--CopyToWiktionaryBot 15:47, 1 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I dispute certain articles that remain included

edit

Dystonia, loss of balance. etc.? These things are not directly related to communication disorders as far as I can tell. Therefore I have tagged the article. Lighthead þ 03:31, 20 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dystonia is a problem for speaking, and loss of balance can be related to hearing problems. WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:37, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Online glossaries of communication disorders

edit

I have found one external online glossary of communication disorders.

Wavelength (talk) 15:43, 23 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

I've removed this (archived now available here) as per the small text at the end of the article it's just an old mirror of Wikipedia's own article. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 22:59, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
edit

I've add a reference to the NIH glossary as this article is a copy paste of that source[1]. As I understand it US federal government works are not copyrighted, but NIH own page on copyright links to an article[2] that states under "Misconception #3: I grabbed it from a government site, so it must be free to use." NIH often licenses privately owned material for display on its website, but the scope of the licenses are rarely broad enough to allow the public to use the material for other than a fair use. NIH sites typically alert the public to this fact in their standard disclaimers. So if someone with better knowledge of US copyright could clarify it would be good.
Earwigs also flags[3] it as a copy of Medical College of Georgia[4], which is copyright 2023 but I think this is also a copy from NIH. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 23:07, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

This[5] was pointed out to me, which makes it clear it wouldn't be copyright. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 00:53, 8 December 2023 (UTC)Reply