Talk:Glossary of tensor theory
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Michael Hardy in topic Cartesian tensors
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Untitled
editThe current definition of Cartesian tensors (oddly called "orthogonal tensors", which normally refers to something different) is incoherent. "In the presence of a tensor ...." The section on the Einstein summation convention should not that if we are not dealing with Cartesian tensors, one of the summed indices should be covariant and the other contravariant. The article Einstein notation is also inadequate here. --OinkOink 06:51, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
OK, I redid the Cartesian tensor section.--OinkOink 09:05, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
2007-02-1 Automated pywikipediabot message
edit | This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
Cartesian tensors
editThis glossary has a fairly long paragraph on Cartesian tensors, which never gets around to attempting to say what they are. Can someone add that. Michael Hardy (talk) 21:25, 7 December 2009 (UTC)