Talk:Glossop/GA1
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Fetchcomms in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 02:23, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
- Quick fail
- There are many poorly sourced and unsourced sections. These include "Roman and Saxon", "Governance", "Geography", "Climate", "Economy", "Parish Church of All Saints", "Transport", "Schools and further education", "Culture", "Emergency service provision", "Twin town", "Literature and the media", and "Notable persons".
- There are countless blatant MOS violations, such as the inclusion of external links mid-prose, and grossly inconsistent date formatting. The article has not undergone a significant copyedit recently and could really use one.
- As the nominator has only edited this article once, is currently blocked, and the issues are too much to address in one week without being too hasty, I am quick-failing this nomination per Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles#First things to look for. I strongly suggest that someone who is willing to put a good deal of effort into this article resolve these concerns, possibly go to peer review, and resubmit at GAN. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 02:35, 29 January 2011 (UTC)