Talk:Glucuronic acid

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pharmacology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemical formula

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The reaction formula on the page is very simplified, and not strictly correct. UDP-glucuron should be a substrate and UDP should be a product. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.160.88.119 (talk) 21:44, 7 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Structure of Glucuronic Acid

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The structure given in the "information bar" on the right of the page is difference from the structure in the reaction scheme (the one in the reaction scheme has an extra CH2 linking to the carboxylic acid (CO2H) group. I think the structure at the top of the page is the correct one, but I'm not an expert in this area. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.44.1.174 (talk) 12:26, 13 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

You are indeed correct. There is an error in File:GlucuronidationBiphenylAmine.png. I have replaced this diagram with a corrected version and nominated the incorrect one for deletion. Thanks for catching the error and reporting it here. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:11, 13 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic