Talk:Glycerol 3-phosphate

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

confusion??

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

As far as I know, Glycerol-3-P is NOT a chemical intermediate in the glycolysis metabolic pathway, at least not significant enough to be stated in the first sentence of the main article. Glyceraldehyde-3-P is, though. -- xy (talk) 04:44, 15 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Name

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I am confused what is the difference between gylcerol 3-phosphate and glycerol 1-phosphate. As the IUPAC name indicates the phosphate group gives the carbon it is attached to priority so it seems like the name should be glycerol 1-phosphate, and glycerol is symetrical so what is the distinction? Also, I notice there is no page for glycerol 2-phosphate, or beta glycerol phosphate. I was thinking it might make sense to include both in one page called "glycerol phosphate" if the two chemicals are not highly different, or even any other versions with multiple phosphate groups if relevant. Thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giftedlyarsenine (talk • contribs) 06:24, 7 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Molecular Weight, correct?

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I just tried to calculate the Molecular Weight and I get 162,0685 instead of 172,073 g/mol, as stated in the Article. I found no mistakes in my calculation: m(C3H9O6P) = 3* m(c) + 9* m(H) + 6* m(O) + m(P) = 3*12,011 + 9* 1,0075 + 6* 15,999 + 20,974 = 162,0685

Please verify. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.52.50.65 (talk) 11:27, 27 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic