This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
These images are so small as to be thumbnails. However, if you click on them you don't get a larger version. This is especially unfortunate, as the labels are too small to read. Someone worked hard to create the image, and dropped the ball at the end. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.48.216.169 (talk) 21:12, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
I think the images are fine. The astrocyte image enlarges when you click on it. The other is a video schematic which will enlarge and play in full screen, with labels that are quite clear to read. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IggyDad (talk • contribs) 18:00, 19 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I have applied the current event tag to the top, as this is still a relatively recent scientific discovery. The time scale for the meaning of "recent" in scientific research is longer than the typical news cycle, but still worth mentioning at this point for something only first discovered in 2013, and followup studies based on the initial research are still in progress. --DMahalko (talk) 05:50, 2 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
