Talk:Go Missin'

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleGo Missin' has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 9, 2013Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 17, 2013.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Kia Makarechi of The Huffington Post wrote that Usher's song "Go Missin'" contains "serial killer-esque undertones" in its lyrics?

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Go Missin'/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Calvin999 (talk · contribs) 15:38, 6 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Info box
  • Add a caption for the artwork

  Done

  • The artwork has Diplo on it, is he a featured artist??

From all the articles I've read, he's only credited as the producer. Usher's SoundCloud page also doesn't list Diplo as a featured artist, for example, for "Lemme See" Rick Ross is mentioned in its title as featured.

  • Genres should be in alphabetical order

  Done

  • Remove the album, recorded and writer parameters, there's no point them being there

  Done

Lead

  Done

  • The singer announced through his Twitter "You loved what I gave you last Valentine's #Climax So here is 'Special delivery from the cloud'Happy [sic] Valentine's Day!". → Prior to its release, the singer tweeted that he had a "special delivery from the cloud" for his fans as they liked how he released "Climax" on Valentine's Day the year before.

  Done

  Done

  • , noting similar musical elements to "Climax". → This is repetition, you can remove it.

  Done

  • Make the lead one paragraph, it's not long enough for two.

Hmmm, I don't know. The lead complies with WP:LEADLENGTH, and I feel like one paragraph just appears cluttered.

Critical response
  • Brown described the tracks as to be → tracks? What other tracks?

  Done Removed plural.

  • noted the collaboration as → described the collaboration as

  Done

  • with the track containing → and thought that the track contained a

  Done

  • though praised → though he praised

  Done

References
  • These are perfect
Status

A pretty short article but it's well written. On hold for 7 days.  — AARONTALK 12:56, 9 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for reviewing, I've addressed your points, bar the last one for the lead. Et3rnal 16:58, 9 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
Okay. I personally think that the second one is too short and the lead looks sparser overall. Having it as one paragraph makes it look fuller. But I'll overlook it this time. Passing.  — AARONTALK 23:15, 9 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Go Missin'. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:38, 13 January 2017 (UTC)Reply