Talk:Gold City
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Skeletor3000 in topic Peacock terms removed/revised
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article should be deleted, because it was copied word-for-word from another website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.139.255.215 (talk) 04:09, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- I can understand why you would say that, but dozens of people have done work on it for 7 years so it's not all just copied, but it does need a lot of work, so how about you help fix it instead of just say it should be deleted? --Musdan77 (talk) 18:42, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Peacock terms removed/revised
editI've just altered or removed the peacock terms in this article. If I missed something, please remove/fix it or replace the template (obviously, fixing it is preferable). I tried to only remove material that provided no factual benefit to the article. If you object to something I removed, feel free to replace it with neutrally-worded content.
I also cleaned up a redundant sourcing template.
This article still has a lot of problems with sourcing, but I don't have much interest in the subject, so I'm not going to take that on.
Thanks!