Talk:Gold Digger (Kanye West song)/GA1

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Ippantekina in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ippantekina (talk · contribs) 08:49, 19 January 2022 (UTC)Reply


I like this song, but find the "broke broke" part in the radio version distasteful (they could've censored it better). Either way, glad to review this GAN within the next week. Ippantekina (talk) 08:49, 19 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ippantekina Many thanks for reviewing this article, though let's hope the large size doesn't prevent you from finishing within this month! --K. Peake 09:29, 19 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Lead and infobox

edit
  • I would write it out as "New York City" instead of "NYC".
  • I would mention when (and by whom) the record for the most downloads a week was broken; 2005 seems like a very long time ago for pop music standard.
  • Ray Charles's per MOS:'S.
  • "The song was named to year-end lists for 2005 by multiple publications" reads awkward; I would go for simple phrasing such as "Many publications included it on 2005 year-end lists".
  • "retrospective lists" you mean of the decade?
  • "moving magazine covers appear alongside West and Jamie Foxx" West and Foxx
  • "West performed the song at the MTV Video Music Awards and Glastonbury Festival in 2005 and 2015" out of curiosity, did West not perform this song frequently on his tours (haven't skimmed the "Live performances" section yet)? Why such a big gap (10 years) between these two events?

Background and recording

edit
  • Very surprised to learn that West appreciated Brian's music through one of my favourite films!
  • "while watching 2004 film Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind" the 2004 film.
  • "creating confused reactions" confusion.
  • I don't think "craft" is a common verb for music production; consider replacing it with "create" or a more common word (ditto the lead).
  • Ludacris's
  • I would just mention that West created the beat at Ludacris's house and remove the speculation part regarding Foxx's role in the Ray Charles movie.
  •   Not done this is notable due to the later mention of West having watched Jamie Foxx in the film and because it provides more context on the recording period --K. Peake 08:19, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • "the second of which was performed live by him early that year" is there a name of the concert/live festival etc. where he performed it?
  • Should "poppy" be in quotation marks?
  • "cool" is informal for an encyclopedic tone.

More to come.. Ippantekina (talk) 05:25, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Composition and lyrics

edit
  • "The former prominently features" I would simply use "Gold Digger"
  • "the second of which ... It begins" confusing
  • "A synth coda is also included, as well as additional vocals by Plain Pat and Don C." The song also includes a synth coda and additional vocals...
  • "West tells a tale about" West raps about/narrates
  • Link groupie and (I assume) prenup.
  • Shouldn't the lyrics be in present tense?

Release

edit
  • I do not see how significant the song's heavy rotation on one radio station (among many) is to this section.

Reception

edit
  • "the levels of talent separating West from that guy at the 7-Eleven" what does the critic mean by "that guy at the 7-Eleven"?
  • "going against the elaborate style of most of Late Registration" you can elaborate this more in the "Composition" section.
  • "features "the odd sound" of Foxx's Oscar-winning impersonation of Charles, alongside the latter being sampled" confusing
  • "Matty G vastly preferred the singer's interpolation of Charles to him "aping Al Green" " some context is needed in relation to the Al Green comparison.
  • The section reads like a disparate collection of opinions with quite many quotes. Some quotations are not exactly helpful i.e. "his wit", "Foxx ad-libbing", "calling for a chant", "smash" etc. Try grouping similar opinions together and paraphrase some quotes for flow.

Controversy

edit
  • Briefly introduce who David Pryor (is this the politician?), Trena Steward and Lorenzo Pryor are.

Accolades

edit
  • Link Shea Serrano
  • "To celebrate their 16 year anniversary in 2016" 16-year
  • "In 2014, NME listed the former" "the former" can be simply "it" or "the song" because it is not to be confused with "Superstition".

Music video

edit
  • "its frequent star Foxx" I don't know what this means.

Commercial performance

edit
  • "biggest hit across the chart's 60 year history" 60-year history

Live performances

edit
  • It may be helpful to note that the version West performed with Lennon in 2003 is not the same as the commercial version available today.

Media + Covers

edit
  • Consider merging these two sections into one "Cover versions and media usage" section (or any title you find suitable).
  • Given the Automatic has covered this song many times, is there any reason given for the band's fondness of this song?
  • Mention that Jack Johnson is a fictional character and the actor that portrayed this character.

Rest of the article

edit
  • Was this song released to radio anywhere? (Release history)
  • Why is there a link to Wiktionary in the External links section?
  • Incorrect usage of possessives is still there (i.e. "Charles' ")
  • References are generally reliable, except for Amazon; if you can find better alternatives, please do. Otherwise this won't affect the nomination.

Verdict

edit
  • The remaining points include: the abbreviation of "NYC" in the infobox, the linking of Late Registration in the prose, the mention of the WGCI-FM radio station in the "Release" section, the "frequent star Foxx" wording, the radio date (I included a link to an R&R archive above), and the Wiktionary link. Ippantekina (talk) 10:26, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Re. the radio mention -- West's "Gold Digger," featuring Jamie Foxx, is a listener favorite in "power rotation" on WGCI, Green said. I get that this song was a smash on radio, but merely mentioning it was a listener favorite on one (among over 15,000 stations in the US) is rather trivial and does not establish notability. Specific numbers (like it being among the five highest audience impression) are more helpful. Ippantekina (talk) 02:25, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply