Talk:Gold compact disc
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 18 May 2019. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
what the hell does all this mean?
editThe list of albums that are 'Gold discs' are not gold. Are they re-issues. All the ones i own out of them are silver, not gold. The only gold discs i know are gold are Michael Jackson's HIStory and Steps greatest hits (I don't own it, by the way!!!). Some say the UK Now 65 is gold as well, but on my two discs is silver. So basically, what type of issue has the albums in the list got - do they mean that all these were reissued by gold blah blah and that is why they are listed? --77.99.231.37 (talk) 19:04, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
It means they have been reissued in gold. Blenheimears (talk) 20:28, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
better sound?
edithere it is stated (in German), that the remastering was done and adding deeper and higher sound giving a maybe fuller sound. Saemikneu (talk) 21:18, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, maybe. I never noticed a difference, though. Many of them are still analog not digital so you have to wonder whether the gold really makes a difference, and I doubt that it does. Geeky Randy (talk) 18:30, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
- Gold does not make any difference in sound on NEW CDs, but the advantage is that gold stays like new forever, whereas aluminum corrodes and quickly becomes more and more transparent. The remastering and other sound treatment, if done, is the same as with aluminum CDs, there is no difference whatsoever. -- Alexey Topol (talk) 09:57, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Lift-lock cases
edit@John M Wolfson: Are lift-lock cases unique to gold CDs? If they are, it is not unreasonable to include the information here. SpinningSpark 12:16, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
- I wouldn't know, but it doesn't necessarily seem like it, and it was mentioned as a potential contract in the AfD. I guess it could be reverted but not as emphasized as it was before. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 16:20, 19 May 2019 (UTC)