Talk:Gold extraction
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article may be too technical for most readers to understand.(September 2010) |
Mercury
edita a My understanding is that a good deal of the mercury in gold ores today actually is from amalgamation. It's not that amalgamation is used today, it's the fact that the old miners left a lot of mercury behind when they were going after the free gold 100+ years ago. This article needs a lot of work! BSMet94 06:54, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Another thing about mercury: the article a states that it's removed from electrowinning cathode material or Merill-Krowe precipitates by retorting. I'm not aware of any examples of retorting the steel wool cathodes prior to smelting. Retorting was the process used when mercury was intentionally used to recover gold by amalgamation. I'm not sure that mercury contamination of electrowinning and Merrill-Krowe intermediate materials is a problem at all (I doubt it). Someone enlighten us. Definitely, mercury contamination of tailings and gaseous emissions from gold ore roasters is a real concern that is dealt with in operating gold plants. I have limited knowledge on Hg disposition in gold recovery. Can someone please clarify this section of the article with some better technical details?BSMet94 20:26, 22 January 2007 (UTC).
Mercury frequently occurs naturally with gold in many deposits, especially in young epithermal deposits, and is nothing to so with the old miners. (I have to do a little research to refresh my memory on this). Mercury is not added at any stage in the Merrill Crowe process and I've never seen it at electrowinning plants though it can come through during extraction. It is generally used to recover gold from gravity concentrates obtained earlier in the milling circuit from corduroy tables, Knellson concentrators and the like. The resultant amalgam 'cake' is retorted very carefully because of the extremely poisonous nature of mercury vapour and it is effectively all recovered. The tailings from the concentrates contain very little mercury and go back into the milling circuit. Mercury contamination certainly can occur from high mercury gold ores but again I need a refresher course to give concrete examples.Egoli (talk) 22:22, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Concentration section
editGold is Also Made of a Substance called 'javier'. Its new and It Creates a Evil Force —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.130.143.58 (talk) 09:22, 29 April 2009 (UTC) I clarified the information that was already in the Concentration section. Some of what is covered has nothing to do with concentration, such as the references to cyanidation, electrowinning, etc. But I left it in until a wider clarification of the whole article is made. Feel free to help out on this...BSMet94 03:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
And I got rid of the little hidden comment in there asking why the gold doesn't electroplate out too during electrorefining. Well, that's why it's called electrorefining. The solution conditions and electric potential across the cell are precisely controlled such that only copper (for instance) plates out on the cathode.BSMet94 04:04, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Enectration?
editIn the section on extration from scrap electronics, the word "enectration" is used. I don't believe this is an actual word since the only search result is for this page. I would change it, but I'm not sure what is exactly meant by "enectration". CrinklyCrunk 14:50, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
- I've never heard the word "enectration" before. Recovery of gold from electronic scrap has a lot of issues. First, there's the obvious materials handling problems. Circuit boards are difficult to move around my automated equipment, and shredding and separation are tricky. The resins present in the circuit board present a lot of emissions (chlorinated hydrocarbons, VOCs, etc.) problems if the recovery method is pyrometallurgical. There's a lot of other metals there too, particularly lead, tin, and copper, mostly in greater amounts than the gold. The gold recovered from e-scrap requires quite a bit of further separation and refining. Just some thoughts. I don't have time these days to edit Wikipedia articles. Hopefully things will slow down at work, and I'll get back to work on this fun stuff.BSMet94 20:41, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Hopefully I too will have more time to edit. But for now, I was curious and found http://www.finishing.com/336/16.shtml while searching for ways to recover gold from e-scrap. Looks hard to to safely. 166.70.62.200 (talk) 22:23, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- I don't think it's hard to recover gold from e-scrap safely, just hard to do it economically AND safely.BSMet94 (talk) 20:24, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
I came to Wikipedia to read up on gold exraction from e-waste and was happy to find a section about it. There is a big market of gold scrap cpu, memory and connector edges on eBay. Several 'home kits' are also sold. And a lot of the waste dumped in third world countries are burned and refined to extract precious metals. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.17.141.54 (talk) 04:53, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Types of ore
editThis article seemed to say almost nothing about what types of gold ore actually found, and which of the processes mentioned apply to which ores. I added a stub section about ores, which I'm hoping is roughly correct, but this needs expanding and it also needs tying in with the rest of the article. Presumably different processes are used for different ores? Anyway, I know almost nothing about this so I'll have to leave it to someone else! Matt 23:58, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi, can someone explain the difference between Gold mining vs. Gold extraction ? For me these two articles are about the same thing and their content are not really different. Thank you Snipre (talk) 20:49, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
- See reply on talk:Gold mining. Vsmith (talk) 22:12, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Gold extraction. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20020401114537/http://info.goldavenue.com/Info_site/in_arts/in_civ/in_civ_overview.html to http://info.goldavenue.com/Info_site/in_arts/in_civ/in_civ_overview.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081211052028/http://neon.mems.cmu.edu/cramb/Processing/history.html to http://neon.mems.cmu.edu/cramb/Processing/history.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080330234816/http://www.ucv.ve/cifi/16%5CArticuloh.htm to http://www.ucv.ve/cifi/16%5CArticuloh.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:53, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Pliny the elder source
editHere is a direct source to what he said:https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.02.0137%3Abook%3D33%3Achapter%3D21 105.225.105.119 (talk) 14:13, 23 June 2023 (UTC)