Talk:Golden Goose (company)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Natalie505 in topic Copyedit changes
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Requested move 23 June 2020
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Calidum 04:11, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Golden Goose Deluxe Brand → Golden Goose – old name outdated GoldenMilano (talk) 14:37, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:14, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- @GoldenMilano, OcarinaOfTime, and Randy Kryn: queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:16, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Golden Goose redirects to the well know fairytale The Golden Goose which is probably the better redirect. If it needs renaming, Golden Goose (clothing brand) or similar would be more appropriate, with the Wikilink just being updated at the top of The Golden Goose. OcarinaOfTime (talk) 21:13, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Seems at its proper place already. Randy Kryn (talk) 23:16, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose as never going to happen. OP seems to be a WP:SPA. -- Netoholic @ 06:42, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Copyedit changes
editCombined several headings that described the headquarters building into a single section. Added citation to the controversy section to include company's response. Other minor changes to improve readability and remove marketing language. Natalie505 (talk) 20:58, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
This reads like marketing material
editI'm tempted to remove most of the article, as the tone and content are not encyclopedic. --Glubbdrubb (talk) 13:25, 7 August 2022 (UTC)