Talk:Golden Miller Novices' Chase

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 00:56, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Jewson Novices' Chase → JLT Novices' Chase – Sponsorship taken up by JLT group on January the 9th 2014 http://www.sportinglife.com/football/news/article/465/9107670/jlt-back-cheltenham-feature Relisted Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:28, 17 January 2014 (UTC) RichDavi28 (talk) 11:45, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

RichDavi28 (talk) 11:45, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

• Oppose. A perfect case of an official name that is not necessarily the best article name. Andrewa (talk) 11:17, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
• Rename to Novices' Chase. There is no need, that the article's name should contain the name of the sponsor. This way the article name also becomes more stable. @Andrewa: Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:29, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Comment: That is progress, and I'm not necessarily opposed to this counter proposal. This is at least not in blatant defiance of the official Wikipedia policy on article names, which nominators of and contributors to requested move discussions are urged to read in several places including the header box of this section (while the discussion is open, it will change when it's closed). But it would be even better if a case were to be made in terms of that policy and/or the many, many information pages that attempt to explain it. No change of vote for now, but I'll try to get back to it. Andrewa (talk) 19:40, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Golden Miller Novices' Chase. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130802034529/http://www.britishhorseracing.presscentre.com:80/Press-Releases/British-Horseracing-Authority-Announces-Upgrades-to-Jump-Pattern-Races-for-2013-14-3fe.aspx to http://www.britishhorseracing.presscentre.com/Press-Releases/British-Horseracing-Authority-Announces-Upgrades-to-Jump-Pattern-Races-for-2013-14-3fe.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:48, 13 January 2017 (UTC)