Talk:Golden Slumbers (The Beatles song)
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
NPOV
editI thought most of the second paragraph was a little too complimentary of the Beatles, but I wanted to get another perspective on it before I changed it. Vint 18:05, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah I agree, judging the song's quality against others on the album, as well as championing Abbey Road over other albums is a bit too POV. PunkOn 03:20, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Terrible article, needs to be rewritten. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.79.63.118 (talk • contribs)
"word for word"
editI reverted a change that said the song was "word for word". The cited sources did not say that (nor do I) and if someone wants to add that they ought to do so with a reputable citation. The paragraph makes it quite clear where the lyrics come from and don't need that phrase, IMO. John Cardinal 00:49, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Golden Slumbers.ogg
edit
Image:Golden Slumbers.ogg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.