Talk:Gone for Goode/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:03, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Link rot: no dead links found

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   A scene involving a funeral accidentally exhuming the wrong body while investigating the Church case mirrored a similar situation described in Homicide: A Year on the Killing Streets from the Parrish case "a funeral accidentally exhuming the wrong body"? Do we mean an undertaker or a funeral director here?  Done

   I made a number of minor copy-edits for clarity.[1]

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   The article is adequately referenced to reliable sources. I assume good faith for all off-line sources.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Thorough, but not over detailed.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Two images used, bot correctly tagged and captioned.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   If you can just fix the exhumation bit above, I will be happy to pass this as a good article. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:23, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

   Good, all is in order, I am happy to list this as a good article. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 21:25, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

• Yeah, that should have read "funeral director", not funeral. I've fixed it. Thanks for the review! — Hunter Kahn 20:55, 13 April 2010 (UTC)