Talk:Gonzalo Curiel (composer)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 10 June 2016
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: No consensus to move the article has been established within the RM time period and thus defaulting to not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Music1201 talk 21:34, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Gonzalo Curiel → Gonzalo Curiel Barba – per http://www.sacm.org.mx/biografias/biografias-interior.asp?txtSocio=08006 this is his full name. Using his full name per WP:NATDAB so this current location can be used as a disambiguation for Gonzalo P. Curiel who is also commonly known as "Gonzalo Curiel", and probably a more notable person by this point than the filmmaker. Ranze (talk) 03:04, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- Because 1. there are only two people sharing the name, 2. the composer's full name is "Gonzalo Curiel Barba", and 3. the judge is arguably more notable than the composer, I would approve the proposed move and suggest that the judge page be renamed "Gonzalo Curiel". Mutual hatnotes should be adjusted to the new names, no dab page required. — JFG talk 07:45, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose None of the references refer to him as "Gonzalo Curiel Barba". It appears that he had two last names but commonly used only the first one, which is common with Hispanic surnames. We should not title this article after a name he hardly ever used. The situation with the judge (who DOES commonly go by Gonzalo P. Curiel) is easily handled by hatnotes. Although it appears some people have been coming here in search of the judge (a few hundred a day judging by recent statistics), that is minor compared to the tens of thousands who have gone directly to the judge's page, so it appears that this is not a huge source of confusion. --MelanieN (talk) 14:48, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose this move, but: maybe we could consider moving it to something like "Gonzalo Curiel (Producer)"? DaltonCastle (talk) 22:53, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Requested move 18 August 2016
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved to Gonzalo Curiel (composer), if I may supervote a more concise disambiguator; Gonzalo Curiel retargeted to Gonzalo P. Curiel for the time being. No such user (talk) 08:54, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Gonzalo Curiel → Gonzalo Curiel (film composer) – Objections to the above RM were based on this Gonzalo Curiel not going by his full name. Page views strongly suggest the judge is WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. He's certainly been in the news recently, so I understand the attempt to call recentism, but being a US federal judge is no small position. And I was surprised to see that this article wasn't created until May of this year, around the time the judge started appearing in headlines (really, when we only had one person by this name, "Gonzalo Curiel" should've been redirecting there). Ever since, the judge is getting a great magnitude of views more than this page. I propose we move this article and retarget "Gonzalo Curiel" to Gonzalo P. Curiel. --BDD (talk) 18:36, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- I would support that. Although it may not matter. This page gets fewer than 10 views most days, so it doesn't seem like very many people are coming here by mistake looking for the other one. --MelanieN (talk) 19:02, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- I did! I'm trying not to take it personally, though. :) --BDD (talk) 19:51, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support – At least some of us learned there once was a Mexican composer sharing this name; isn't Wikipedia a wonderful thing? — JFG talk 00:37, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support as a guy who just went to the wrong page. WP:RECENTISM aside, the judge is clearly the primary topic compared to a relatively obscure Mexican composer with only a stub article. That may change some day, and if and when it does, we can revisit. TJRC (talk) 21:37, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Piano concertos
editGonzalo Curiel wrote 3 piano concertos
The first in 1948 The second in 1950 (premiered in 1951) the third was incomplete
this should probably be mentioned somewhere
- 1. I forgot to sign my post, and 2. I added it myself. RandomEditorAAA (talk) 02:30, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Translation
editShows signs of being a very poor translation from another language. ELSchissel (talk) 02:14, 28 May 2022 (UTC)