Talk:Goo (album)

Latest comment: 5 years ago by 62.205.76.225 in topic Not two but four songs by Kim Gordon

Album cover art

edit

The comment about the art in the Cover section contradicts the Myra Hindley article. I don't know enough about the Moors murders or Sonic Youth to resolve this discrepancy. Can someone please reconcile this? — Zaui (talk) 17:56, 4 May 2006 (UTC)Reply


it also doesn't link to the Myra Hindley article - maybe a redirect is needed? 71.227.216.77 09:38, 24 January 2007 (UTC) <- sorry, wasn't signed in Glitterglue 09:39, 24 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Track Listing

edit

Did someone do this whose first language wasn't English? Why is 'Dity Boots' listed as 'Boots Oh So Dirty' and moreover, why is the tracklisting of the deluxe edition clearly wrong (compare to Amazon.co.uk)?

Vandalism

edit

This page needs to be protected in some way. Vandalism has plagued it for a while. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Machu505 (talkcontribs) 22:24, 7 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello

edit

was this article written edited by Kim Gordon herself? or her publicist?

...because, i can't really think of another reason why two of the three paragraphs in the "Music" section are devoted specifically to the two songs Kim Gordon wrote (out of the eleven total songs on the album). seems disproportionate. also seems like something else.

? 2/11 of the songwriting credits = 2/3 of the article ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.103.104.103 (talk) 01:26, 5 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Goo (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:04, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Goo (album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 17:21, 10 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

I'll review this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 17:21, 10 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

I'm copyediting as I read through; please revert if I screw anything up.

  • You treat the band as plural in some sentences ("Sonic Youth decided to sever relations with their former label") and singular in others: "Sonic Youth announced that it had signed". It should be consistent. My understanding is that bands are singular in American English and plural in British English, so I would think singular is the correct choice here, but consistency is the main thing.
  • Sonic Youth decided to sever relations with their former label, Enigma Records, as a result of friction arising from, among other things, the band's displeasure with Enigma's indecisive marketing and distribution of Daydream Nation, as well as its accompanying single, "Teen Age Riot": suggest breaking up this sentence; it's long and hard to parse -- for example it's not clear what the referent for "its" is until a couple of words afterwards.
  • a full experimental album of: odd phrase; why "full"?
  • the Ciccone Youth side-project: can we get either a link, an inline explanation, or a footnote for this?
  • His stance having the potential to scare away record executives represented the: clumsy; how about "His stance, which had the potential to scare away record executives, was the".
  • Much to the group's chagrin: Why? Was there cachet in being on Geffen?
  • admittedly, both Ranaldo and Steve Shelley were uncomfortable: why "admittedly"? I think you can just cut it.
  • Goo found Sonic Youth expand upon: tense problem. Do we need to give the band name here? How about just saying "Goo expanded upon..."?
  • touched upon Carpenter's life with deft insight: we can't have "deft insight" in Wikipedia's voice; this needs to be attributed, although given the following sentences I think you could cut the phrase completely and go with '"Tunic (Song for Karen)", Gordon's ode to Karen Carpenter of the Carpenters, was an exploration of self-esteem and body image that traced..."
  • reappropriated the sound for the totality of "Scooter & Jinx": what does "totality" mean here?
  • This incited Geffen executive Mark Kates: suggest "prompted" instead of "incited".
  • radical—even defiant by a 1990 major label standards: just checking that this is the original quote; it's clumsily phrased with "a 1990 major label" functioning as an adjective, so I wondered if the "a" was perhaps just a typo.

-- Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 18:02, 10 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Mike Christie I am making progress on corrections but I needed to touch base on your "Was there cachet in being on Geffen" question. The answer is: no; the sentence you are referring to states they had an issue with working under Geffen's new subsidiary. After all, Sonic Youth spent all that time negotiating for an established major label, not a brand new one.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 16:40, 11 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
OK, that explains it. Could we add a word or two to that sentence to that effect? Perhaps "The group were glad to have reached a deal with an established major label, but much to their chagrin", or something along those lines? Other readers unfamiliar with the music business might find that helpful. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 16:51, 11 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
Mike Christie I apologize for the sluggish pace; it has been a tough week but I found time and believe I have addressed your concerns. Let me know if there is more I should do.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 02:29, 16 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
I've struck all but one point above -- looks like you missed it? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 09:52, 16 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
Mike Christie my bad. I went back and shortened and rephrased the sentence. Hopefully, it has more clarity.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 14:36, 16 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
That does it. Promoting to GA. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:55, 17 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Not two but four songs by Kim Gordon

edit

The way the article is written suggests that Kim Gordon only wrote two of the songs, ignoring "My Friend Goo" and "Cinderella's Big Score". That should probably be cleared up. 62.205.76.225 (talk) 04:34, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Reply