A fact from Gooba appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 June 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
DYK nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:03, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
- ... that American rapper 6ix9ine requested permission from a judge to record the music video for "Gooba" while in home confinement?
- Reviewed: Na Lani ʻEhā
Created by Lk95 (talk) and AshMusique (talk). Nominated by Nice4What (talk) at 23:01, 8 May 2020 (UTC).
- All of the criteria are met aside from a QPQ, which is required before the hook can be passed. Thatone
weirdwikier | Say hi 16:58, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Thatoneweirdwikier:
QPQ started but issues still need to be addressed.Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥) 20:24, 10 May 2020 (UTC) - Done. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥) 21:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Everything has been satisfied. I personally prefer the original to ALT1. Nice work! Thatone
weirdwikier | Say hi 03:51, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- The review has to list out that each criteria is met. The easiest way is to just use the template in the edit "Reviewer's template for easy copy+paste" box when you're editing this page. @Thatoneweirdwikier: can you please do that? The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:19, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
- No problem. Thatone
weirdwikier | Say hi 06:04, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- No problem. Thatone
- Everything has been satisfied. I personally prefer the original to ALT1. Nice work! Thatone
- @Thatoneweirdwikier:
- All of the criteria are met aside from a QPQ, which is required before the hook can be passed. Thatone
General eligibility:
- New enough:
- Long enough:
- Other problems:
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Other problems:
Hook eligibility:
- Cited: - In the article, it is thoroughly cited, which is fine. Ignore the 'x'.
- Interesting:
- Other problems:
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Good to go. Thatoneweirdwikier | Say hi 06:04, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for redoing this review. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥) 19:57, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
I request an edit .Can I edit where it says label ? I want to add Create Music Group to there .
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can I edit where it says label ? I want to add Create Music Group because that is 6ix9ine's label . Branwen Brettle (talk) 18:04, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- Not done. Please provide a reliable source that supports this information. (I removed the one that was there for the same reason). –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 13:17, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 13 May 2020
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Article states the security of 6ix9ine are seen in the music video, citing insider.com (https://www.insider.com/tekashi-6ix9ine-gooba-music-video-livestream-snitching-prison-release-2020-5?amp) which make the claim. When going to the moment in the video, where insider.com say - during the ankle monitor moment, security are not seen but crew of the video covered in paint. The article is making a false statement.
Moment when the video claims: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPw_izFr5PA&feature=youtu.be&t=118
No security is seen. Boggit Meister (talk) 02:07, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Not done. It's not clear what changes you want to make. Moreover, if you want to challenge sourced material, you'll need to provide other sources that contradict it. Your own analysis constitutes original research. Moremoreover, the Insider piece says nothing about where in the video this happens, so the lack of appearance at one particular timestamp doesn't mean much. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 02:48, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Belle Delphine cover
editI saw a cover mentioned. I think Belle Delphine's cover, that has 51 million views its worth noticing here by its relevance to the main article: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TL470fJMi7w 90.170.23.52 (talk) 22:16, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- Her remix/parody called "I'm Back" would be mentioned if it was discussed in WP:SECONDARY sources published by reliable platforms. I saw the views were up to 776,000, not even a million. The number of views is not enough by itself. Binksternet (talk) 23:39, 17 October 2023 (UTC)