Talk:Goodbye, Michael/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Guy546^(Talk) 19:47, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

• I'm not sure what makes this a reliable source, as it seems to be a fansite and only has a general summary of the article and not the entire plot of the article that it is referenced to.
  • Now satisfactory.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)

b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

Pass/Fail:

Just needs one tiny reference fixed then it is ready to be a GA. Guy546^(Talk) 20:09, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

I believe it is now ready NoD'ohnuts (talk) 22:21, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Good work. Guy546^(Talk) 02:53, 1 May 2011 (UTC)