Talk:Goodbye for Now (song)

Fair use rationale for Image:Pod goodbye for now.jpg

Image:Pod goodbye for now.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Pod goodbye for now.jpg

Image:Pod goodbye for now.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:02, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Katy Perry

I don't think Perry is credited with her feature on this single. The single cover doesn't mention her name, nor does the album track listing itself. It's similar to Gavin Rossdale's album, where she just sings background vocals. Yves (talk) 03:18, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Move?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved per discussion below. - GTBacchus^(talk) 08:33, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

---

Goodbye for Now (P.O.D. song) → Goodbye for Now (song) — Only one song on Wikipedia with the title; artist disambiguation not necessary. Other song on the current disambiguation page could be a hatnote on the song's article. Yves (talk) 09:19, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

• Wikipedia lists 2 songs with the title. Goodbye for Now (song) is a disambig page. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:52, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
  • The other song does not have its own article, nor even a redirect. Naming conventions for music states to use only further disambiguation when needed. Yves (talk) 23:03, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
    • But people might be looking for the other song, even if it's not currently covered in a separate article. Is there some other reason to consider this song much more notable than the other one? If not, oppose.--Kotniski (talk) 13:17, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
      • Again, a hatnote would take care of that. The song has charted on four Billboard charts, as well as in Germany. As for the song from Reds, first of all, it's not even sourced. Secondly, looking at article stats of each link from the disambig page, the Sondheim song barely gets any views, while the other [Goodbye_for_Now_(P.O.D._song) averages around 60 a day]. A Google search shows the P.O.D. song is primarily what is most referred to, excluding the hits that use the phrase "goodbye for now". Yves (talk) 18:45, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
        • All right, sounds convincing, support.--Kotniski (talk) 09:12, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.