Talk:Goodwin Liu

Learn more about this page

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government / Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Asian Americans Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Asian Americans (assessed as Low-importance).

United States courts and judges Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Federal court nomination

Latest comment: 12 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Why was the mention of criticism by Whelan at National Review Online removed? 192.12.184.2 (talk) 16:29, 6 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Pointing out that National Review criticizes an Obama nomination is about as useful and surprising as pointing out Huffington Post criticizing a Bush nomination. Maybe you can add something to the National Review wiki page about it but to mention it in the Liu article is undue weight. 128.2.51.144 (talk) 19:44, 21 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

How come no reference to his support for "reparations" for slavery? Is this not a controversial view for someone supposedly being groomed by the Democrats to be the first Asian on the SCOTUS?

Here is a link of Liu discussing reparations. Sounds supportie to me.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avrtiUrIvd4&feature=related —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.27.40.153 (talk) 22:21, 20 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Given the rational that the National Review criticizing an Obama nominee is not "useful" or "surprising", I've removed the following paragraph because it is not useful or surprising to see that a lot of high profile Democrats, the partisan American Bar Association, and Liu's friends would support the nomination.

Liu's nomination earned support from former Independent Counsel and Whitewater prosecutor Kenneth Starr,^[1] former Associate White House Counsel to President George W. Bush Richard Painter,^[2] former Acting Solicitor General to President Bill Clinton, Walter Dellinger^[3] and both of California's Senators Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer,^[4] as well as gaining a "unanimous well-qualified" rating from an American Bar Association committee that screens prospective judicial candidates on their competence, integrity and judicial temperament.^[5] His nomination was also supported and lauded by his colleagues at UC Berkeley, including Christopher Edley, Jr. and John Yoo,^[6] and the director of the conservative^[7] Goldwater Institute, Clint Bolick, who praised his approachability and calm temperament.^[8]

I think it is ok to put the paragraph back in so long as, for the sake of NPOV, we do include some of the substantive criticisms of Liu that caused his nomination to be opposed. Readin (talk) 17:10, 24 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

References

^ Kenneth Starr and Akhil Amar Pen Letter Backing Liu, "ConfirmGoodwin.com", March 24, 2010.
^ Goodwin Liu and the Case of the Missing Brown Bag, "Legal Ethics Forum", April 7, 2010.
^ Obama nominates Berkeley professor Goodwin Liu to federal appeals court, "The Washington Post", February 24, 2010.
^ Boxer Praises President's Nomination of Goodwin Liu for U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals , "Official Website of Senator Barbara Boxer", February 24, 2010.
^ David Ingram. "Legal Times". Retrieved 2011 August 15. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
^ "President Obama Nominates Berkeley Law's Goodwin Liu for U.S. Court of Appeals". UC Berkeley School of Law. 2010-02-24. Retrieved 2011-08-15.
^ Kirkpatrick, David D. (December 28, 2009). "Health Lobby Takes Fight to the States". The New York Times.
^ Parsons, Christi (2010 February 2accessdate=2011 August 15). "Obama zeros in on law professor for 9th Circuit post". Los Angeles Times. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)

Judicial Service

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The last sentence of "career" says: "Liu has never served as a Judge in his entire legal career."

This language is suspicious. I think it should either be removed or changed to something more like "Prior to his appointment to the Ninth Circuit, Liu had not served as a judge."

Opinions?

Cranialsodomy (talk) 00:17, 8 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

I think its important to tell the reader that he hadn't previously been a judge. As to how it should be worded I think your suggestion is fine so long as you change appointment to nomination since he hasn't yet been appointed.Chhe (talk) 04:22, 8 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

"Stalling tactics"

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This description of the reasons for the second delay is clearly not neutral as written. If you can find a quote where a figure of public significance has described them as "stalling tactics", it would be appropriate to include that. 97.123.117.18 (talk) 15:48, 9 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

I agree that it could be worded more neutrally, but I wasn't able to find yet what specific legislative action was used so that I could substitute it for the words "stalling tactics". I think its important though to inform the reader that the precedings were postponed twice followed by a third attempt to get them postponed that Leahy decided to reject. P.S. as far as the "figure of public significance" goes the ref seems to suggest that it was Senator Leahy who said that.Chhe (talk) 17:13, 9 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Easy enough to put quote marks around it then. 192.12.184.2 (talk) 14:06, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Supreme Court Nomination

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

He has not been nominated to the Supreme Court. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.207.94.152 (talk) 23:27, 16 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nominee status

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Somebody please remember to remove the "Nominee infobox" on Dec 31, when his nomination expires. In accordance with WP:CRYSTAL, I don't want to do this right now when Senate is still in session, but as his nomination expires, it's time to do that and make changes in the article accordingly. Mhym (talk) 21:52, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Chinese v. Taiwanese Descent

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In this edit user Megartasm changed the early life section to say that Liu is of Taiwanese descent. This was undone in this edit by IP address 71.1.246.127. From what I've been able to tell through my investigation, Liu's parents are referred to in publications as Taiwanese, not Chinese. I have made this change and added a citation. That said, it is important to maintain WP:NPOV, so I'm interested in additional comments and references on this issue if anyone has them. Sailing to Byzantium (talk) 19:02, 2 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Goodwin Liu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120301184843/http://hlpronline.com/2009/12/history-will-be-heard-an-appraisal-of-the-seattlelouisville-decision/ to http://hlpronline.com/2009/12/history-will-be-heard-an-appraisal-of-the-seattlelouisville-decision/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:44, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Goodwin Liu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:00, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Goodwin Liu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:14, 26 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Goodwin Liu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:34, 21 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic

[1] Kenneth Starr and Akhil Amar Pen Letter Backing Liu, "ConfirmGoodwin.com", March 24, 2010.

[2] Goodwin Liu and the Case of the Missing Brown Bag, "Legal Ethics Forum", April 7, 2010.

[3] Obama nominates Berkeley professor Goodwin Liu to federal appeals court, "The Washington Post", February 24, 2010.

[4] Boxer Praises President's Nomination of Goodwin Liu for U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals , "Official Website of Senator Barbara Boxer", February 24, 2010.

[5] David Ingram. "Legal Times". Retrieved 2011 August 15. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)

[6] "President Obama Nominates Berkeley Law's Goodwin Liu for U.S. Court of Appeals". UC Berkeley School of Law. 2010-02-24. Retrieved 2011-08-15.

[7] Kirkpatrick, David D. (December 28, 2009). "Health Lobby Takes Fight to the States". The New York Times.

[8] Parsons, Christi (2010 February 2accessdate=2011 August 15). "Obama zeros in on law professor for 9th Circuit post". Los Angeles Times. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]