GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jhbuk (talk) 11:13, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- Looking at the past PR and the GAR, there were many good comments placed at improving the article, but I can only really see fairly minor edits [1] (rearranging, the odd ref etc) since the PR started. It does not appear that either User:Mono or User:Extra999 have made any contributions at all to the article since that time. As a result, I can only direct you to the comments there, in particular the most significant ones regarding referencing (still several cn tags, "Productivity tools" is completely uncited) and scope (and is therefore not providing substantial enough coverage). At the moment, I might consider putting the article on hold, but based on the reaction to the PR, I cannot see any reason why any significant work would be done now. I really cannot add anything more at this point than what was written in the PR. Jhbuk (talk) 11:46, 2 April 2010 (UTC)