Talk:Google Fonts

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Google Fonts article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Typography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Google Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Google, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Google and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GoogleWikipedia:WikiProject GoogleTemplate:WikiProject GoogleGoogle articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Google To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Articles for most of the other products listed here and here.
Assess : All articles in the Category:Unknown-importance Google articles and Category:Unassessed Google articles using the project's assessment scale
Expand : Google Mapathon, Google Talkback
Maintain : This WikiProject
Merge : Google mobile services into List of Google products
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class Google articles and Category:Google stubs
Update : List of features in Android and Gmail interface#Product integration. Update logos of Google Marketing Platform products
Other :
- Add more stuff to this to do list if you like! (click here...)
- create:
- Help the Google article for a good article status
- Improve the Outline of Google
- Get more members using :
{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Google/Invite Members}}
- Infobox Images with transparent areas needing a different background color

Computing: Software / Websites / Security Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Websites (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer Security (assessed as Low-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Licence

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article lacks information on what license Google Fonts are under.

Good question. I found it here and added the information to the article. Hulten (talk) 19:04, 2 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

The "on average" fallacy

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

This statement has no value:

"...on average each of its 993 fonts has been downloaded over 19 billion times, and that each person on Earth has, on average, downloaded each font at least two or three times."

In fact, probably only a tiny percentage of the world's population has ever downloaded a single font from the collection. It's like putting Bill Gates into a room with 10 people on SNAP and then concluding that "...on average the people in the room had a net worth of $1 billion dollars." It's statistical legerdemain. Nicmart (talk) 02:59, 12 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

"If all fonts in the collection were printed at 500 points and taped together, they would reach to the moon and back 84 times!" Nicmart (talk) 03:03, 12 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Criticism

Latest comment: 8 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Nevermind this, I did a little bit of searching and I can't seem to find any reliable sources that comment on this. I suppose I've been fooled by a small minority of typographers into thinking that this is a big issue.

Should we add a criticism section? I've seen criticism of Google Fonts on a couple typography forums and in self-published articles (I don't have the links on hand, but will find and share on request). As far as I know, none of these meet the WP:RS criteria, but I'm sure if they were covered there I can find some reliable secondary sources that discuss the criticism.

To actually name the criticism, from memory it's mostly about the questionable quality of the fonts available from Google Fonts, as well as the problem with Google controlling yet another part of the web. /home/gracen/ (yell at me here) 16:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic