This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 9 June 2011. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Definitely notable
editEvery major media outlet is covering this today. Pianotech Talk to me!/Contribs 21:59, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- Added a ref and removed speedy. Google Guitar is notable (today, anyway).
- AfD - fair enough. :) My main concern was rescuing it from an undeserved speedy. Pianotech Talk to me!/Contribs 22:24, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- yeah maybe i was a little too quick on the speedy, you have to admit though the first draft of the article looked like speedy delete material. I didn't realize it was that well covered in the media. Karl 334 ☞TALK to ME ☜ 22:26, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- Definitely, the first draft was bordering. Prior to that, I removed a "patent nonsense" speedy on it because I guess someone thought it was a hoax. :) Anyway, good call on the AfD. Pianotech Talk to me!/Contribs 22:29, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
The topic has Encyclopedic merit. It is a nominal leap in Google theme design, and it has triggered a public and a media interest that does beg dispassionate objective explanation not found elsewhere. It has a 'current events' nature that is best served only by Wikipedia and the knowledgeable editing and expansion found here.
I would expect to find discourse on and links to:
- history of Google themes, notable themes
- encoding and/or structure (for web developers)(expanded, referenced, copyrights, patents, credits )
I'm sure there's more that others can think of.
"It exists, will someone please explain it" --Ssaco (talk) 22:06, 10 June 2011 (UTC)