Talk:Google Translate
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Google Translate article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Languages in development
editLanguages in development should be put back. It is important to know what languages will be coming through. 24.108.18.81 (talk) 04:29, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- -- I think there should be no issue putting back the language in development. Based on this research paper(https://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.03983.pdf) and secondary sources (https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/technology/google-building-a-1000-language-ai-model-to-beat-chatgpt/articleshow/98474049.cms). Rocky 734 (talk) 02:48, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Star Garnet:, can you bring back the Languages in development section with modernistic tabular form :-) . Rocky 734 (talk) 03:03, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- So sorry about that! I hadn't intended to delete that subsection; I even updated it before table-izing the main section. If anyone wants to suggest info that would be better-served by a table vs. a list, I'd be happy to convert it. (I don't think there's any RS way to source how long a language has been in development?) Star Garnet (talk) 03:17, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Googie 119.13.62.54 (talk) 21:08, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry for the late reply, Thanks @Star Garnet for bringing back the Languages in development section.
- >any RS way to source how long a language has been in development?
- I don't know but shall try my best to find out the reliable source. I will update here, If I will get any. Rocky 734 (talk) 14:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
- So sorry about that! I hadn't intended to delete that subsection; I even updated it before table-izing the main section. If anyone wants to suggest info that would be better-served by a table vs. a list, I'd be happy to convert it. (I don't think there's any RS way to source how long a language has been in development?) Star Garnet (talk) 03:17, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Star Garnet:, can you bring back the Languages in development section with modernistic tabular form :-) . Rocky 734 (talk) 03:03, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hello 2600:1702:3380:AE00:3CE1:ECD2:6FD:AE81 (talk) 02:00, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- I. Love you 209.64.129.151 (talk) 19:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
I think this section should be removed now that Google has phased out the Contribute feature. We can no longer tell which languages are in development. Serchia (talk) 18:20, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- You're right, but we should at least wait for I/O (May 14), when Google generally announces new languages for Translate. Joseph (talk) 18:16, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Is there evidence that it will annouce at May 14, 2024? 216.186.51.109 (talk) 16:06, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah where is the evidence 134.204.2.226 (talk) 00:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- You lied to me! You didn't prove any evidence and there wasn't any new languages! 64.124.92.43 (talk) 03:33, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- I said "generally". Joseph (talk) 07:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Google didnt announce anything this year. I guess we can delete this section since we dont have any reference. Joseph (talk) 07:11, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- See, I told you need evidence! 216.186.51.108 (talk) 19:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Actually, they did announce the languages. It was on June 27, 2024. The evidence for this is here: https://blog.google/products/translate/google-translate-new-languages-2024/?utm_source=kw-newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=06262024&utm_content=cta Who is Amire80 (talk) 14:32, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
They did not add Chukchi as one of the languages.
editThose news reports either made a mistake or lied about that. Please do fix. 2A06:63C1:9904:E900:BC05:DF71:C6A0:937B (talk) 10:35, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- There is also a possibility it might have been confused with Chuukese, which I forgot to acknowledge here. 2A06:63C1:9904:E900:BC05:DF71:C6A0:937B (talk) 10:37, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Crimean Tatar as a ”Russian language”
editAs Crimea is currently a disputed territory (even if de facto administered by Russia), I find it highly political to call Crimean Tatar a ”Russian language”. Would you agree to move Crimean Tatar ahead in the sentence?
(Even calling the other languages mentioned ”Russian languages” seems too political – it would be like calling Breton ”a French language.”) 37.96.27.196 (talk) 09:38, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- I've changed Russian to Russia. Joseph (talk) 15:37, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. It’s better now. Still, given the dispute about Crimea (de facto Russia, de jure Ukraine, according to this Wikipedia), we cannot list Crimean Tatar as a language in Russia. Any suggestion for a re-wording? Otherwise, I’ll move it next to Tok Pisin. Wikipedia is not a political forum. :-) Telepanda (talk) 18:06, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- With June 2024 update, languages spoken in autonomous Republics of Russian Federation were added. Tuvan, Yakut, Meadow Mari, Chuvash, Bashkir, Chechen, Ossetian, etc. Maybe, we can change the languages.
- On the other hand, outside of Crimea, Crimean Tatar is spoken in Russia, Ukraine, Romania and Turkey. So, we can consider Crimean Tatar a regional language in Russia, since it is also spoken in pre-2014 borders of Russia. Joseph (talk) 18:49, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. It’s better now. Still, given the dispute about Crimea (de facto Russia, de jure Ukraine, according to this Wikipedia), we cannot list Crimean Tatar as a language in Russia. Any suggestion for a re-wording? Otherwise, I’ll move it next to Tok Pisin. Wikipedia is not a political forum. :-) Telepanda (talk) 18:06, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Article reads as a marketing article.
editArticle reads as a marketing article and is somewhat ambiguous and deceptive, although I find it (Google translate) interesting. 2001:999:608:614F:ED73:DA08:2E7C:67D1 (talk) 15:01, 18 July 2024 (UTC)