Talk:Gopsall

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gopsall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110903022316/http://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/tce_faqs.htm to http://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/tce_faqs.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:57, 21 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Small modification

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I have slightly changed the wording of some of the opening lines as a casual reading of it seems to suggest that the estate was always a part of the Crown estate, when in fact it was not owned by them until the twentieth century. I don't think that this is an unreasonable edit, it merely better clarifies the situation. Original text: "The area was formally part of the Crown Estate, owned by but not private property of the Monarch." My change: "The area was in recent times part of the Crown estate."

I think the succeeding sentence should also be changed, but I am very wary of making edits to wikipedia entries as some editors can be very hostile to changes, though I have no reason to think that previous editors of this page would behave in this manner. Thank you. John2o2o2o (talk) 10:48, 2 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Change away - it was only recently added, and reads like it is suggesting that Gopsall was excluded from Shackerstone Estate 'for the sake of clarity', which I suspect was not really the reason. That being said, it would be useful if there was a reference to a reliable source for any of this. Agricolae (talk) 17:16, 2 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic