Talk:Gordon Edwards (scientist)
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Gordon Edwards (scientist) be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
 | Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Gordon Edwards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://sun4.vaniercollege.qc.ca/math/2faculty.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080129181554/http://www.thegatewayonline.ca:80/expert-weighs-in-on-nuclear-power-20080124-1698.html to http://www.thegatewayonline.ca/expert-weighs-in-on-nuclear-power-20080124-1698.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:59, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Unreferenced
editThis whole article is in desperate need of references. The 1st reference listed actually contradicts the article. If additional references aren't added I'll edit the article to match the ref. Daffydavid (talk) 04:28, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Article for deletion
editThe only reference attached that appears to be valid indicates the person to be unqualified. Daffydavid (talk) 10:33, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Daffydavid, do you know what happened to your AfD nomination? Somehow it got replaced by a question from a single-edit user @Covingni. I redid an AfD which is now being attacked by more single-edit users. That's life.
- The current page clearly does not qualify, with no verification and no real attempt to prove notability. It does not look as if anyone is going to make a rescue bid, just attacks. Ldm1954 (talk) 23:35, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Ldm1954: Appears that Daffydavid didn't make an AfD at all and mistakenly thought that the article's talk page was the appropriate venue for such discussion. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 01:09, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- @GhostOfDanGurney, hmmm, then how did the first AfD get created? It has been sitting in the AfD list for a while, a software glitch?
- Anyway, an AfD is clearly appropriate. (I don't like PRODs.) Ldm1954 (talk) 01:20, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- I think the other user (@Covingni:) saw the AfD tag and clicked on (what would have been a WP:REDLINK to the) discussion page and simply created a new page with their keep !vote. I can't be certain, but I suspect this is the most likely scenario. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 01:26, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Ldm1954: Appears that Daffydavid didn't make an AfD at all and mistakenly thought that the article's talk page was the appropriate venue for such discussion. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 01:09, 12 September 2024 (UTC)