Talk:Gorse in New Zealand
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gorse in New Zealand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120222014558/http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/research/biocons/weeds/gorse/biocontrol_progress.asp to http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/research/biocons/weeds/gorse/biocontrol_progress.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:55, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Reworked article
editI reworked the article which seemed to have everything in the intro section, and few subdivisions. Apart from modifying sentences to fit the new structure, and incorporating commented out material, I haven't made any real content changes. Any suggestions as to a better structure would be appreciated. The article now needs further expansion.
Also looking at the edit history I see the incorrect photos (removed yesterday) were complained about a month after they were added, but due to the complaints being suppressed, the wrong species has been displayed here for 8 months! --Tony Wills (talk) 10:43, 30 July 2017 (UTC)