Talk:Gossage

Requested move 5 June 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus ~ Amkgp 💬 17:05, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

---

Gossage → Gossage (company) – Not a clear primary topic. There are four people with surname Gossage (Goose Gossage, Bill Gossage, Howard Gossage, and Lucy Gossage), and both Goose and Howard get significantly more page views. So I propose moving the company and making Gossage a dab page. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:15, 5 June 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. buidhe 01:02, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

• Support per nom. The company is obscure relative to some of the people. BD2412 T 21:32, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
• Oppose per WP:PRECISE. No one would expect any of the people with the surname to appear under this title, and the fact that this article gets only about 6 views per day shows there is not a great deal of confusion. The hatnotes are just as good as a dab page for the few people who wind up at the wrong place. Station1 (talk) 05:38, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

• I understand WP:PRECISE, but how many people are going to be searching for a soap brand that ceased to exist in 1942? Joseph2302 (talk) 07:01, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

• As I mentioned, very few, no more than 6 per day on average. And how many are searching for Howard or Goose by typing "Gossage"? Also no more than 6 per day. So why bother with a move that makes virtually no difference to anyone? Station1 (talk) 11:31, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

• I frequently search for people by surnames, when I can't remember their first names. And I'm sure many other people would do. And if both are being done 6 per day like you hypothesise, then that means I'm correct in asserting there is no clear primary topic, in which case a DAB should be used. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:41, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

• Not both; all uses together are no more than 6 per day[1] (actually fewer when you allow for incoming external and internal links). And a dab is used; the hatnotes serve precisely as a dab page would, without inconveniencing anyone searching for the one article on WP that uses the natural title. Station1 (talk) 12:44, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

• Perhaps the solution is write an article on the surname itself at this title. BD2412 T 15:42, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.