Wikipedia

Talk:Grade I listed buildings in Bristol

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Featured listGrade I listed buildings in Bristol is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 3, 2007Featured list candidatePromoted

Images

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Can I suggest moving St Mary's, Redcliff to the top, as it is the most impressive image. And because vertical images don't sit weel among landscape images. Amandajm (talk) 12:39, 28 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Errors of Fact

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

According to Bristol City Council there are 100 Grade I buildings in Bristol, Bristol City Council Listed Buildings

Kingswood is not in Bristol, it is in South Gloucestershire so Whitefield's Tabernacle should be removed.

The Bristol Old Vic is not a listed building but the Theatre Royal, which is occupied by the Bristol Old Vic company is.

I shall address this over the next month. Jezhotwells (talk) 08:23, 24 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

I agree about the number of buildings. The PDF document that can be downloaded from the council's web page has 52 (?) entries, but that is the number of listings, not the number of buildings, and I assume that for the figure of 100 they are counting each address covered by listings such as "NUMBERS 7 TO 13 AND ATTACHED AREA RAILINGS, 7-13 PORTLAND SQUARE". Perhaps it would be clearer to say "X buildings covered by Y listings". I am sceptical about 100 being an exact count, as making an exact auditable count is not really in their brief. I would favour the inclusion of a qualifier such as "approximately", even though it's not in the source. That probably makes me a bad wikipedian.
Whitefield's Tabernacle does seem to be an anomalous inclusion.
There is a note that "The entry for Bristol Old Vic includes the Theatre Royal and Coopers Hall", i.e. two Grade I buildings are covered by one article. Wrong. Bristol Old Vic is the relevant article, but the listing is for "The Theatre Royal" which includes Coopers Hall. Next time someone mentions the Old Vic I shall frown and say "Do you mean the Theatre Royal?" William Avery (talk) 10:44, 24 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • It's a common mistake - The Bristol Old Vic is a theatre company which has occupied the building since 1946. Older residents of Bristol sometimes refer to the building as the "Old Gaff". The photographs show the Coopers' Hall which was made into the entrance circa 1970. The Theatre Royal lies behind this building and is not visible from the street. I have considered spitting off the Theatre Royal from the BOV article. Even the council have it wrong with their brown tourist signs which refer to the Bristol Old Vic with a Tudor rose, indicating a heritage site, rather than the drama masks indicating a theatre. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:24, 24 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
As the one who created & did most of the work on this list - a couple of bits of explanation related to the points made above -reject as you see fit.
  • Number of listed buildings - I think the council is a bit confused on this - If you look at List of Grade I Listed Buildings in Bristol from the City Council you will see 51 entries - these are based on the English Heritage records, which are notoriously inconsistent and occasionally inaccurate, This problem of deciding what is "a building" is even worse on List of Grade I listed buildings in Bath and North East Somerset where the council says there are "663 Grade I listed buildings" but there are only approx 100 listings (sorry for the inaccuracy I'm still working on that one) This is because a whole street of listed buildings can be covered by one listing whereas others such as Widcombe Manor House has separate listings for the fountain, walls, balustrading, gates etc which are attached to it. The wording used on that list is "Bath and North East Somerset has 663 Grade I listed buildings, one of the highest concentrations in the country,: which are covered by approximately 100 English Heritage listings."
  • Whitefield's Tabernacle, Kingswood is not in Bristol, but there was early discussion on the Bristol wikiproject about what to include in Bristol & following "Common usage" Kingswood was included as most people who live there describe it as Bristol rather than S. Glos - but I'd be happy for this one to be removed from this list as it is included in List of Grade I listed buildings in Gloucestershire
  • Theatre Royal for Bristol Old Vic see EH listing
Great to see the efforts to get this list right - I'm currently spending most of my WP time on the sub lists of List of Grade I listed buildings in Somerset & trying to get consistency between all the lists around the country is a real challenge.— Rod talk 12:15, 24 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

100 GI listed buildings

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

I have problems with the recent change to 100 Grade I listed buildings - for which I've not seen any evidence. Perhaps the city council should be contacted for an updated list. — Rod talk 17:40, 24 July 2009 (UTC) A quick search of Images of England using advanced search Place Name=Bristol & Building Grade = I gives 52 results.— Rod talk 17:43, 24 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

The last report from English Heritage in 2006 that counts the listed buildings, Heritage Counts, says 62 Grade I listed buildings.[1]--Aldux (talk) 17:53, 24 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
I reckon I'll have to go to the planning department and see what they have, but they make that claim on their website[2] and I have put the cite in the article. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:03, 24 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
POsibly the count includes railing, sundials, etc. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:06, 24 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Converting OSGB36 (OS grid refs) to coords on this list and others

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have started a discussion about converting the OSGB36 (OS grid refs) on this list and others to use Template:Coord, as I think this offers advantages for users worldwide (who may be unfamiliar with the OS system) and the use of Template:GeoGroupTemplate to enable mapping on googlemaps etc. I have been told that a bot could be tasked to do this, however this would be quite a significant change and would not want to do it without consensus. If anyone has any comments could they join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Geographical coordinates#Automagically converting OSGB36 to coord?.— Rod talk 16:25, 18 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified 12 external links on Grade I listed buildings in Bristol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:27, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified 32 external links on Grade I listed buildings in Bristol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:11, 7 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Grade I listed buildings in Bristol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:32, 29 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Grade_I_listed_buildings_in_Bristol&oldid=1207371573"