Talk:Graff (jewellers)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Spintendo in topic Article additions - Aug 2018


Paragon (diamond)

edit

I have already merged the article on the Paragon diamond to this article, but it was undone without clear explanation. The diamond isn't independently notable, as there isn't significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. Fences&Windows 23:41, 6 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose There is adequate coverage of the diamond in numerous sources, as one would expect for a gem of such distinction. The jewellers are just the current owners and it is not associated exclusively with them as it has had other owners and wearers. And we have much more to say about the jewellers as a business. Colonel Warden (talk) 23:58, 6 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Rectifying citation issue on page

edit

Hello Wiki Editors,

My name is Guy - I work for Graff's marketing team.

Can you please kindly help me address the issue relating to a citation concern shown on Graff's wiki entry? I have listed some third party sources for the 'sourcing' text below:

Sourcing:

Graff Diamonds adheres to the Kimberley process and avoids conflict diamonds. The majority of its diamonds bear laser engravings that allow their origin to be traced.

</ref>http://www.genesisdiamonds.net/blog/celebs/laurence-graffs-diamond-hairstyle</ref> </ref>http://upstart.bizjournals.com/views/blogs/fashion-inc/2007/11/29/luxury-and-ethics-the-words-v-the-reality.html</ref> </ref>http://jewishbusinessnews.com/2013/10/15/lawrence-graff-s-diamond-company-creates-stunning-500-million-hair-piece</ref>

I have many third party sources to improve neutrality of the remaining sections - if this is something which can be resolved?

Many thanks,

Guy — Preceding unsigned comment added by PaleFireUK84 (talkcontribs) 13:13, 4 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Graff Diamonds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:59, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Graff Diamonds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:59, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Article additions - Aug 2018

edit

Hi Fellow WikiEditors,

We have some additional information I was wondering if this could be verified and added to the "Sourcing" section of the article:

Graff’s cutting and polishing is carried out in Johannesburg by South African Diamond Corporation (Safdico). This is the first stop for rough diamonds, where 300 employees cut and polish them. Graff employs 700 people worldwide to aid the process from rough stone to final piece of jewellery.

Relevant reference source for this - [1]

Smailser (talk) 09:52, 22 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Reply 22-AUG-2018

edit

    Edit request implemented   Safdico is a division of Graff Diamonds.[2] Thus Graff's choice of contractor to use for various points of production is a routine business decision shared by thousands of businesses everyday in the course of retail practice (and thus is arguable whether it is worth mentioning.) If this routine business decision were to be mentioned, the relationship between Graff and Safdico at least ought to be clearer (e.g., "Graff’s cutting and polishing is carried out in Johannesburg by South African Diamond Corporation, a division of Graff.")  spintendo  11:55, 22 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ http://www.thejewelleryeditor.com/jewellery/article/laurence-graff-awarded-an-obe-for-his-services-to-jewellery/
  2. ^ Sheng, Ellen (29 May 2012). "Graff Executives Tout Jeweler's $1 Billion IPO". WWD.