This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ashibaka wrote: "don't see the anon's problem, this is only reworded and makes no "bibliographic" changes".
Well, Mr. or Mrs. Ashibaka:
- Gran Atlas Aguilar is NOT a seventh edition of an earlier work since it is completely new.
- Atlas Universal Aguilar had NO 166 pages of maps, but – as I wrote, 116.
- Who says it was "the most elaborative" atlas of its kind after WW II?
It's not reworded, but a wrong translation. In bibliography it's those little things, you know.
Start a discussion about improving the Gran Atlas Aguilar page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Gran Atlas Aguilar" page.