Talk:Grand Avenue–Newtown station

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:163rd Street–Amsterdam Avenue (IND Eighth Avenue Line) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 17:33, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

The discussion was closed as no consensus on 3 March 2017. Slambo (Speak) 15:28, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Grand Avenue–Newtown (IND Queens Boulevard Line)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 12:59, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Will take this one. 12:59, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

• Lead and infobox; all good
• Section 1;
  • Link Manhattan, on the first mention
• Section 2;
  • Link sans serif lettering and Cerulean

• Section 2.1; all good
• One dab link, found. Fix this.
• Two dead links, found. Fix them.
• 25.4% confidence, event though the violation is unlikely, I suggest to rephrase the sentences in section 2.1. As it detects lengthy sentences.

Excellent article, very well written. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 14:22, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. I have fixed the Manhattan link, and I have linked Cerulean and sans serif. I fixed the sentence, and I have gotten rid of the bad links. They aren't needed. The dab link is only used at the top of the page to indicate other articles with Grand Avenue. If there is anything else please mention it.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 14:55, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your help.

---

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 15:31, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Where the Queens Boulevard Line joins Queens Boulevard

There's one aspect about the vicinity of the station that I didn't see in the article; This station happens to be where the IND Queens Boulevard Line actually starts running beneath Queens Boulevard, after previously running under Broadway. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 00:31, 21 March 2017 (UTC)