Talk:Grand cross (astrology)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Eweezeke in topic Not ultimately leading to

Example

edit

The case of Saturn at 15° Virgo, Uranus at 15° Sagittarius, Neptune at 15° Gemini and Pluto and 15° Pisces is a real grand cross dating from the late 1560s (the time of the last waxing square between Neptune and Pluto).

1999 Grand cross

edit

I've heard numerous mentions of a Grand Cross happening in 1999, as the planets "lined up in the fixed signs of Aquarius, Leo, Taurus and Scorpio, which just happen to correspond to the four beasts of the apocalypse" (see here). Sounds like some people made a pretty big deal about it (the end is nigh! and all that), but I was expecting mention here and found none. Is it actually just not notable, or am looking in the wrong place? -M.Nelson (talk) 06:47, 18 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

I came here because two separate fiction sources both referred to something called a "grand cross" in or around 1999, and likewise was hoping to find more information. Instead, I only find a bunch of barely comprehensible nonsense about it's astrological meaning. How about historical significance? Frequency of occurrence? Cultural significance? 65.190.247.221 (talk) 19:34, 9 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Not ultimately leading to

edit

I would like to see this line changed from: "ultimately leading to indecisiveness and an inability to produce concrete achievements"

To some like: "The grand cross does not guarantee failure"

Eweezeke (talk) 19:20, 22 August 2018 (UTC)Reply