 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
As qualified as Stephen Hawking may be, A Brief History of Time is hardly a fitting scientific work from which to cite material for an encyclopedia. If we are going to cite references we can at least do so from proper scientific literature or at least modern physics textbooks. -- Fropuff 01:01, 2004 Feb 16 (UTC)
Disagree. It's from a reliable source, and it's extremely relavant to the article. I see no reason to take it out. You could also cite more recent ones, but I think it's a good addition to the article. →Raul654 01:16, Feb 16, 2004 (UTC)
The GUT scale is incorrectly given in terms of eV in this article; should be GeV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.15.122.212 (talk) 16:50, 6 May 2017 (UTC)