Talk:Grant Morgan (American football)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by LunaEatsTuna in topic GA Review

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk05:10, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Created by PCN02WPS (talk). Self-nominated at 19:37, 11 October 2021 (UTC).Reply

  •   Article is new, long enough and neutral. It is sourced with inline citations. For some references, I have limited or no access. I AGF for them. "Earwig's Copyvio Detector " reports insignificant text similarities only. The hook, I prefer the original one, is well-formatted, and interesting. Its length is within limit. For the accuracy of the hook's fact, I AGF of the references (#2, #11), which I can not access. QPQ was done. Good to go by AGF. CeeGee 10:52, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
ALT0 to T:DYK/P7

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Grant Morgan (American football)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna (talk · contribs) 00:48, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply


Will review later today.  LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 00:48, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Fun read! On hold. Over to you.  LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 05:23, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
@LunaEatsTuna Thanks for the review! I believe everything is taken care of, so it's ready for another look! PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 14:58, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Anytime! Looks great; definitely good enough now to pass. Congrats!  LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 23:19, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Copyvio check

edit

Earwig gives no concerns.

Prose

edit

Refs

edit

Passes spotcheck on refs 1, 2, 10, 12 and 16. Nice work. :]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.