| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Merge
editWouldn't it be better to have Wishdokta and Grant Nelson as a single page? --The very model of a minor general (talk) 14:45, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
grant nelson did produce under the alias wishdokta this was more in his early days and hardcore, as a grant nelson wiki page i think it would be wise to meerge all of his alias's as there are a few and just have them in chronological order.
the guy is very talented aswell he rarely makes a musical error and i think the music industry is a better place when he is around —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.240.49.115 (talk) 07:32, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Jeez...
editCould this get ANYMORE POV!?!?
<snip>
These lines sat there for years and I don't believe that this is the way a encyclopedia should be written. OXYGENE 7-13 (TALKPAGE) 19:50, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- Cut them out because they were copied from an external source. But you were so right, User:oxygene7-13. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:23, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- This discussion allready moved to Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard, but what do you mean by copied from an external source... I copied them from the article to make a point. Or is it that these lines in the article were allready copied from somewhere else? OXYGENE 7-13 (TALKPAGE) 15:38, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- She means it was copied to the article by someone (not you) from a magazine article. That's a copyright violation. Your pasting it here was innocent, but even here it's still a violation, so she removed it from the talk page too. Zaereth (talk) 23:34, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- It was already solved on Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard, but thanx anyway. OXYGENE 7-13 (TALKPAGE) 11:58, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed
editPrior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/clubz/4982361/A-QA-with-Grant-Nelson.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:32, 23 March 2016 (UTC)