Talk:Granuloma inguinale

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Naming

edit

The WHO's ICD10 version 2006, currently lists this as "Granuloma Inguinale" with "Donovanosis" as lesser alternative name. Generally such WHO preference takes priority (see Wikipedia:WikiProject Drugs/General/Naming of drug pages re use of International Nonproprietary Names for drugs). So should this page be moved ? If not then the article could do with some specifically linked footnote citations to current worldwide (vs perhaps just US) state of consensus naming for this condition. David Ruben Talk 00:14, 28 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

I concur, it should be called Granuloma Inguinale HassanKachal (talk) 19:20, 24 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Whatever you choose to call it, how did it get the name "donovanosis"? Is it named after someone named Donovan?

Classification

edit

Where is the source for the change of name from Calymmatobacterium to Klebsiella?? HassanKachal (talk) 19:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

cleanup

edit

there were vast repetitions which i have now rectified. HassanKachal (talk) 19:26, 24 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Granuloma inguinale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:21, 22 October 2017 (UTC)Reply