Talk:Graph isomorphism problem
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Helfgott preprint
editHelfgott, who found the original mistake in preparing his Bourbaki talk on the breakthough, has endorsed the revised proof as correct, gave his Bourbaki talk regarding the updated proof, and has made his forthcoming paper available on the arXiv [1]. 129.68.82.96 (talk) 19:05, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Lede
editWP:LEAD never is a good argument for removing content, but rather works towards either a) moving content to the main body or b) reproducing the content in the main body.TR 07:37, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- from Talk:Isaac_Newton_in_popular_culture#Survey. Staszek Lem (talk) 18:23, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Graph isomorphism problem. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150721175904/http://eprintweb.org/S/authors/All/ka/Kaibel/16 to http://eprintweb.org/S/authors/All/ka/Kaibel/16
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:05, 22 October 2017 (UTC)