Talk:Grassroots Campaigns, Inc.

Untitled

For now, I'm going to refrain from contributing to this page - since I've written so much about the subject and am unfamiliar with wikipedia protocols for this sort of thing. but I think there should be prominent mention of GCI's relation the Fund for Public Interest Research and PIRG family. Also, there should be reference to the book [http://www.amazon.com/Activism-Inc-Outsourcing-Strangling-Progressive/dp/0804752176/sr=8-1/qid=1158713165/ref=pd_bbs_1/102-6114555-1273716?ie=UTF8&s=books Activism Inc], which directly addresses GCI. Bencampo - can you contact me at greg dot bloom at gmail dot com? --Greggish 18:07, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

And I also removed the link to my book. I dunno, despite its relevance, it doesn't seem appropriate. --Greggish 12:42, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

NPOV

Added Advert tags as the History section lists quite many numbers without independent citation. Current Work section is based upon the organization's website. Also, members of this organization seem to be adding tags to other organization wikis (see Common Cause) to indicate they have worked for them before. How is this relevant? Phaedrus79 17:28, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Business

According to the Berkeley, California office, it's only legally for profit so that it can funnel money to the Democratic Party and other organizations more easily. This is very different than a business. Since this is something I learned from a primary source we need to find references for it. SteveSims (talk) 01:02, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

FYI- Grassroots Campaigns, Inc. still uses funny tactics to get out of paying their workers. For instance, all assistant directors are salaried, which means they can be overworked and underpaid. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.174.248.243 (talk) 17:31, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

More Business

Another note is that they (PIRG and GCI) do not hire directors without college degrees. While this may seem normal the problem is that they constantly hire people with no canvassing experience who by not fund raising enough develop a "deficit" with the company. They literally end up owing the company money. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.149.192.242 (talk) 16:52, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

This is not true... both PIRG and GCI currently have people and have had people on staff without their college degrees = any business would love to have the right people on their staff, duh! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teamtrees (talk • contribs) 22:48, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Should lede reflect criticism/lawsuits?

I think so, given that there are 3 diff states listed.. Others' thoughts? -aNon 12.144.160.217 (talk) 21:50, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

RfC

BAn RfC: Which descriptor, if any, can be added in front of Southern Poverty Law Center when referenced in other articles? has been posted at the Southern Poverty Law Center talk page. Your participation is welcomed. – MrX 16:44, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Grassroots Campaigns, Inc.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100322212723/http://pol.moveon.org/2006report/ to http://pol.moveon.org/2006report/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930023721/http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?articleId=11993 to http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?articleId=11993

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:30, 22 October 2017 (UTC)